Internet may not be ready for high-quality streaming media

Is high definition video over IP going to bring down the Internet (and your phone calls)? (No.)

Every day, it seems, a new service pops up offering to send you video over the Internet. "Desperate Housewives," Stephen Colbert heckling the president, clips of bad dancers at wedding parties: It’s all there.

You may be up for it, but is the Internet?

The answer from the major Internet service providers, the telephone and cable companies, is "no." Small clips are fine, but TV-quality and especially high-definition programming could make the Internet choke.

Most home Internet use is in brief bursts — an e-mail here, a Web page there. If people start watching streaming video like they watch TV — for hours at a time — that puts a strain on the Internet that it wasn’t designed for, ISPs say, and beefing up the Internet’s capacity to prevent that will be expensive.

To offset that cost, ISPs want to start charging content providers to ensure delivery of large video files, for example.

Internet activists and consumer groups are vehemently against those plans, saying they amount to tilting the Internet’s level playing field, one of the things that encourages innovation. They want legislation to guarantee a "neutral" Internet, but prospects appear slim.

At the heart of the debate is a key question: How much would it really cost the Internet carriers to provide a couple of hours of prime-time TV over their networks every day?

The carriers are playing their cards fairly close to their chest, but there are ways to get close to an answer.

One data point: As a rough estimate, an always-on, 1 megabit-per-second tap into the Internet backbone in downtown Atlanta, bought wholesale, costs an ISP $10 to $20 a month, according to the research firm TeleGeography Inc. An ISP’s business is carrying data from that tap to the customer.

One megabit per second doesn’t sound like that much, but ISPs spread that bandwidth out over their subscribers. Analysts estimate that ISPs sell around 30 times more bandwidth to their end users than they can connect simultaneously to the Internet (the figure probably varies widely from provider to provider).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Netscape
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

  • David Sterry Says:
    5-15-2006 04:23:15

    I’m sure the internet will cope. HD and other video is just the reason we need to light up all that dark fiber. The *real* impediment to internet video distribution are the telecom and cable companies themselves. They’d naturally like to reduce competition to their own content delivery channels.



  • MrBill Says:
    7-11-2006 20:56:39

    It’s not easy to tell you the facts without coming across as totally self-serving. Full disclosure – I am the CEO of StreamerNet and I have over 27 years experience in high-tech markets and products. The bottom line is that it’s a noisy world out there and it is increasingly difficult to rise above the din. Please treat yourself to a look-see at the StreamerNet Mobile Video Producer http://www.streamernet.com/html/solutions.html to see how we can simplify all things video.

    StreamerNet offers a unique set of visual communication tools that enable desktop delivery of video email, personalized coordination of highly-private OnDemand video hosting and delivery, and sophisticated reporting solutions to manage Enterprise knowledge base requirements. Additional features enable the creation and distribution of easy and affordable web-based video advertising.

    This is definitely not about those Video Amusement Portals and I am simply compelled to tell you about it. Please let me know if I can personally assist you with answers or insights.

    Regards
    Bill



  • Trackbacks

    You must be logged in to post a comment.